Thesis Details
Porovnání klasických metod plánování
This bachelor's thesis deals with the topic of automated planning and the methods which deal with its problems. The analysis and comparison of the methods STRIPS, Graphplan and HTN takes place, which implement different approaches to planning. Their performance is tested on typical planning problems, which focus on various planning challenges. The goal was to find suitable planning problems for each of the methods, as well as their strong and weak points regarding the given problem. For testing purposes, existing implementations of the methods were used, which showcase their behaviour.
Automated planning, Planning methods, Planner, STRIPS, Graphplan, HTN, Hierarchical planning, Planning graph, Planning problem, Planning domain, PDDL, Classical planning
Bařina David, Ing., Ph.D. (DCGM FIT BUT), člen
Hynek Jiří, Ing., Ph.D. (DIFS FIT BUT), člen
Kekely Lukáš, Ing., Ph.D. (DCSY FIT BUT), člen
Zbořil František, doc. Ing., Ph.D. (DITS FIT BUT), člen
@bachelorsthesis{FITBT24596, author = "Rebeka \v{C}ernianska", type = "Bachelor's thesis", title = "Porovn\'{a}n\'{i} klasick\'{y}ch metod pl\'{a}nov\'{a}n\'{i}", school = "Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology", year = 2022, location = "Brno, CZ", language = "czech", url = "https://www.fit.vut.cz/study/thesis/24596/" }